The case for decentralization
Transferring government power from one centralized body to another is the hallmark for many of the greatest revolutions in world history. The United States Constitution attempted to arrest this time-old cycle by empowering the states as a decentralized balance to the power of the federal government.
By extension, the states should empower the counties as a decentralized balance of power for the states. In this way, the power to rule would theoretically be decentralized from the federal level down to families and individuals. Legitimate government must derive its power from the will of the people.
The United States Constitution clearly envisioned virtue as the stabilizing principle for decentralized power. In the absence of virtue, centralization would inevitably evolve toward a state that dishonors the rights, responsibilities and will of the people, and all other life. Thus, virtue and the decentralization of governmental powers reinforces legitimacy. Loss of governmental legitimacy stimulates fragility to the core that binds a nation.
Information technology connects us today in ways that were not contemplated or planned for at the founding of modern nations. Despite the possibilities that technology provides, centralization has prompted a perverse instantiation of intended outcomes. Instead of an increased ability to comprehend the mind and will of the people, centralization allows a few powerful groups to manipulate what is heard and seen.
Before enumerating a subset of the grievances and burdens under which we suffer under centralization, we first acknowledge some of the significant good that arises due to centralized structures:
Benefits of Centralization
- Unprecedented resources concentrated within corporations, encouraging development of knowledge and technologies that have improved life expectancy and basic comfort for many.
- Decentralized technologies exist today only because of the significant foundation built by centralized entities in pioneering hardware, software, and services for information technology.
- Incredible access to knowledge and communication that connects and inspires us globally.
- Funded salaries for many individuals to participate in creation of open standards such as the World Wide Web Consortium.
- Wikipedia is an example of decentralized community action to accumulate knowledge started and maintained by a centralized organization.
- The US Interstate System as well as major roads and highways in many nations exist due to resources acquired by centralized governments.
- Centralized law enforcement has (and still does) provide safety and justice to many people.
Burdens of Centralization
- Enables private interest groups to manipulate the people through propaganda designed and perpetuated by mainstream media.
- Allows "big tech" corporations to censor the speech of others with opposing views.
- Leads to more centralization and larger corporations, governments and organizations.
- Prefers central planning, which always has unintended consequences.
- Incentivizes class distinctions between those with power and those without.
- Requires elected leaders to access excessive amounts of money as a prerequisite to election, producing leaders with unstated constraints tied to their funding sources.
- Abstracts elected leaders away from the consequences of their choices. The people bear the consequences of their decisions.
- Breeds nationalism, which fuels the fires of war and ecological degeneracy.
- Forces physicians to apply outdated medical consensus over science for fear of losing the licence to practise.
- Reduces a person's reputation to their wealth, credentials, and status conferred by existing power structures. Virtue does not feature.
These significant benefits, however, must be viewed in light of the significant burdens they place on the freedom of the people. In light of both the benefits and burdens of centralization, it is wise to transition centralized technologies and services to decentralized alternatives where possible. Rather than abandoning centralization altogether, decentralising seeks to return accountability and power to local communities by removing centralized control and power structures wherever they are no longer the superior choice.